3 ms·
Survivorship bias. Every Palestinian faction that advocated for peace or a two state solution no longer exists. What happened to them? I don't know, but their
by muzani 1y ago
Survivorship bias. Every Palestinian faction that advocated for peace or a two state solution no longer exists.
What happened to them? I don't know, but their land is now claimed as a part of Israel. I don't believe they gave it up willingly. Back when people were debating genocide, one of the arguments was that there's more Palestinians than ever before. It used to be ~1 mil over the various states of Palestine, now it's ~5 mil in West Bank and Gaza, and many more all over the world.
The only ones left are the militants because everyone who tried everything else were killed or displaced.
- tguvot 1y ago[flagged]
- aspenmayer 1y agoAre you sealioning in this thread too? I just saw you doing it in the other thread. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45222886 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45222886
- tguvot 1y agoasking simple question once is sealioning now ?
- muzani 1y agoYes, that is textbook sealioning. This comment is sealioning too. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and repeat it in the most polite way possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning It is time-consuming and pointless to answer questions that are made in bad faith. I'm happy to answer if it's an actual question with intent to understand, not undermine. The answer is there in the comment. But the majority of your post history is just bad faith political campaigning.
- tguvot 1y agoclaiming that question was made in bad faith is good way to avoid answering question. and what you do also textbook sealioning. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and go with it. literally what you did. there were no palestinian fractions in past decades that advocated for peace and two state solutions and got killed or displaced. this is the core reason for you not been able to answering such a simple question and sailing away into "bad faith" and "sealioning" arguments. i was under impression that this site encourages fact based discussion. fact based discussion typically requires facts. you have none.
- aspenmayer 1y agoWow, you really commit to the bit. https://www.wikihow.com/Committing-to-the-Bit https://www.wikihow.com/Committing-to-the-Bit This is what you sound like: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/lolcow https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/lolcow