3 ms·
Then I guess you become a monarchist, like Curtis Yarvin. But of all things Charlie Kirk was not, first among them: He was not "a threat to democracy".
by eYrKEC2 1y ago
Then I guess you become a monarchist, like Curtis Yarvin.
But of all things Charlie Kirk was not, first among them: He was not "a threat to democracy".
- the_gastropod 1y ago[flagged]
- billy99k 1y ago[flagged]
- Cornbilly 1y ago[flagged]
- infamouscow 1y agoUnless you actually have the ability to deploy the military, it's genuinely stupid to leap to this conclusion. To be clear, this is not an insult or ad hominem. You have to actually be stupid to think random citizens can magically deploy the military just by saying so. This is personal moral failure on your part, no different than being a liar, thief, murderer.
- alessandru 1y agoand you're just stupid. like reading is the first part before those other things.
- infamouscow 1y agoYarvin has written at length about how his monarchy vision isn't even possible within the USA today. A stronger statement is: you have to actually be stupid to think POTUS can magically deploy the military just by saying so. Virtually all of Yarvin's work is systematically breaking down all of the barriers even if one has that power.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- anigbrowl 1y agohttps://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/charlie-kirk-calls-full-military-212306543.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/charlie-kirk-calls-full-... idk, this doesn't sound very democratic to me