4 ms·
It's nice that they are expanding. But I really wish they would add IPv6 support for EC2 instances. It sucks to not be able to natively use IPv6 for UDP applica
by tav 14y ago
It's nice that they are expanding. But I really wish they would add IPv6 support for EC2 instances. It sucks to not be able to natively use IPv6 for UDP applications on EC2 :(
- justincormack 14y agoObviously thats going to be a very different team, but absolutely agree. Plus ipv6 for s3 and cloudfront...
- donavanm 14y agoNow Im curious. How many of your clients a) truly support IPv6 b) require IPv6? And the follow up to b, what does IPv6 provide that v4 does not?
- flyt 14y ago- Few now, but more soon as ISPs ramp up IPv6 deployment - Almost none require v6 - It provides future compatibility as the v4 address space is (effectively) used up and can't cover new services joining the internet in the future. Full Internet conversion to v6 is critically needed and inevitable. Supporting it on a large service like AWS accelerates familiarity with the technology and enabled more people to silently begin making use of v6.
- justincormack 14y agoOutside the US there is a serious shortage of ipv4 addresses. But there are chicken egg problems using ipv6 so everyone needs to support it to help resolve these. Think of it as a helping hand for app developers in the developing world. I use it as a filter too. The people who have implemented ipv6 are ahead of the curve so I look on them more favourably.