Control is control, I agree! Did I ever disagree? We all have our own motives behind keeping control and I find it hard to believe that Zuckerberg's motives we

Control is control, I agree! Did I ever disagree? We all have our own motives behind keeping control and I find it hard to believe that Zuckerberg's motives were as pure as claimed in the article (given the history of the guy and all). I believe there is a high likelihood that the young Zuckerberg of 8 years ago may have had other motives behind keeping that control, far more personal motives than the original article implies. Also, Based on Zuckerberg's stronger focus on product as opposed to business, which I feel is a pretty big weakness when your a CEO, I have my doubts he was even thinking about IPO back then, and I'm sure he is regretting thinking about IPO now.