At least for me, NoScript is less a reaction to annoying ads, and more a reaction to "not wanting to see your god damn web 3.0 flashy bullshit." Unless I expli

At least for me, NoScript is less a reaction to annoying ads, and more a reaction to "not wanting to see your god damn web 3.0 flashy bullshit." Unless I explicitly need to interact with a website, I'll just leave it in a dumb js-less state so I can read without having random signup forms, broken scrolling, moving graphics, etc. popping up in my face every minute or two. If those flashing blinky annoying things are ads, then those are disabled too, but it's by no means the main reason I use NoScript. I couldn't understand if the article was serious or not. The point about AdBlock seems sort of in the right direction, if a bit missing the point - but the next two just left me scratching my head.