3 ms·
> And it has little to do with guns. If someone really wanted to get to the guy, one would. Disclaimer that this is early and I may be wrong, but I read that h
by silverquiet 1y ago
> And it has little to do with guns. If someone really wanted to get to the guy, one would.
Disclaimer that this is early and I may be wrong, but I read that he had a security detail (which seems rather likely). I doubt an attacker with a knife would have had success.
- joecool1029 1y agoThey still get through and do damage. Salman Rushdie and Jair Bolsonaro come to mind on recent-ish high profile knife stabbings.
- paulryanrogers 1y agoObviously attacks happen even without guns. But it is harder to kill someone without a gun, and harder to kill multiple people or from a distance without one. Guns aren't as generally useful as knives. So it makes little sense to have 1.2 guns per person, or really any private gun possession. The price of mass murders, shooter drills, and firearm accidents aren't worth what marginal benefits guns may bring.