3 ms·
i'm confused. in what way is this a response to the article? the article laments the sidelining of physical exhibits, in favor of software. you respond that th
by testaccount28 1y ago
i'm confused. in what way is this a response to the article?
the article laments the sidelining of physical exhibits, in favor of software. you respond that the screens probably have an arduous and expensive procurement process.
what's going on here?
- dylan604 1y ago[flagged]
- octo888 1y agoGuidelines: > Don't be snarky. > Edit out swipes.
- mepiethree 1y agoI don’t see the value in condescending here. I think the person you’re responding to highlighted an interesting question/point of confusion of whether digital exhibits are on average more or less expensive than physical exhibits in both the short and long term.
- watersb 1y agoI inferred that a museum exhibit setup might be a package put together by a contractor. And the contract selection process might put a relatively low priority on amount of screen tech in the package. Museum might get locked into a vendor tech support package after procuring a digital-display-heavy exhibit. Oh joy.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 1y ago[flagged]
- stronglikedan 1y agoIt's called a conversation, and yes, those happen here on HN.