3 ms·
no the bet is lost on every count 1 it's not fully autonomous, there's a remote operator 2 not a wide enough service area as defined in the bet 3 it's a pilo
by dingnuts 1y ago
no the bet is lost on every count
1 it's not fully autonomous, there's a remote operator
2 not a wide enough service area as defined in the bet
3 it's a pilot program, also excluded in the bet
4 it's also a year late and the bet is very much still lost
lol but we're going to have self driving cars by 2015 guys!
- wedn3sday 1y agoIs the remote operator actually driving under normal conditions, or do they just step in during an exigent circumstance?
- SpaceNoodled 1y agoThe latter.
- Agraillo 1y agoThe latter, there's an article about this particularly [1] [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/09/03/technology/zoox-self-driving-cars-remote-control.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/09/03/technology/zo...
- finolex1 1y agoThis specific bet is very targeted, but we do absolutely have commerciallly available self-driving cars in 2025 in several cities, and the list of cities is rapidly expanding. An 8-10 year delay from expectations is not too bad all things considered.