3 ms·
So which is worse? - funding something people benefit from but is not part of your mission - funding something which is in your mission, but nobody uses? The f
by monkeyelite 1y ago
So which is worse?
- funding something people benefit from but is not part of your mission
- funding something which is in your mission, but nobody uses?
The former is questionable. The latter is a just a waste.
Do you care about education outcomes? Or do you care about 90s symbols of education, like libraries.
- yifanl 1y agoWhich is worse, buying Marlboros for the students, or buying books for the library?
- monkeyelite 1y agoYou got me. Especially with the edit from heroin.
- snozolli 1y agofunding something ... but is not part of your mission That is worse. It's education, not a startup in need of a pivot.
- monkeyelite 1y agoMost Americans disagree and see athletics as an integral part of a rounded education.
- snozolli 1y agoYou're the one who drew the contrast in the first place! You characterized it as outside the mission and now you're trying to say it's part of the mission. Come on.