5 ms·
Lossless Listening Arrives on Spotify Premium
- mouse_ 1y agoYeah but your smartphone can't play it without resampling it, and last I checked, your Bluetooth headpods can't play it without reencoding it. Lossless streaming is a marketing ploy that wastes resources for no reason. High bitrate opus is better for streaming.
- eli_gottlieb 1y agoI mainly use Spotify for listening to music while I work, on a desktop or laptop, with a good headset rather than ear-buds.
- patentatt 1y agoI think there is value in having only one lossy encoding step on the way to my ears. And with all of the 4k video being streamed these days, lossless music bit rates are rather pedestrian, so I'm just not that concerned about the resources argument
- ZeroGravitas 1y agoIf the audio is AAC and the Bluetooth headphones support that codec, it won't be reencoded.
- HelloUsername 1y ago> smartphone can't play it without resampling, and Bluetooth without reencoding Straight from the article that you could've read: "For the smoothest and best listening experience, we recommend streaming lossless music on Wi-Fi using wired headphones or speakers on a non-Bluetooth connection, like Spotify Connect. Currently, Bluetooth doesn’t provide enough bandwidth to transmit lossless audio, so the signal has to be compressed before being sent."
- sudosysgen 1y agoAptX HD and LDAC at 990kbps are functionally lossless. AptX Lossless is, well, lossless.
- karmakaze 1y agoI keep my LG G8 around just to use its quad-DAC and wired headphones. For wireless I have 2.4GHz earbuds using LC3 codec.
- puszczyk 1y agoFinally Spotify adds a feature I look forward to
- basisword 1y agoFour years after it was announced, not as high quality as the competitors, no sign of Atmos. You can see why they couldn't justify charging more for it.
- dtagames 1y agoThe article says next month it will come to Sonos. That's ideal because those speakers are not Bluetooth; they're on your Wi-Fi.