4 ms·
AI already has significant cost of entry, given the amount of data/compute you need. Why would regulatory compliance be the limiting burden?
by biophysboy 1y ago
AI already has significant cost of entry, given the amount of data/compute you need. Why would regulatory compliance be the limiting burden?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- loeg 1y agoWhy not advocate for additional burdens?
- biophysboy 1y agoAll I'm doing is challenging a vague accusation. You can claim regulatory capture for any proposal. All policy has tradeoffs; speculating vaguely about negative consequences does not help me weigh that balance.
- nothrabannosir 1y agoIn a profit driven world, regulatory capture is the default assumption. Genuine corporate philanthropy is the exception that deserves special attention. Suspecting a company to act in its own profit enhancing interest is borderline tautological.