3 ms·
> Develop and publish safety frameworks, which describe how they manage, assess, and mitigate catastrophic risks—risks that could foreseeably and materially con
by terminalshort 1y ago
> Develop and publish safety frameworks, which describe how they manage, assess, and mitigate catastrophic risks—risks that could foreseeably and materially contribute to a mass casualty incident or substantial monetary damages.
> Report critical safety incidents to the state within 15 days, and even confidentially disclose summaries of any assessments of the potential for catastrophic risk from the use of internally-deployed models.
> Provide clear whistleblower protections that cover violations of these requirements as well as specific and substantial dangers to public health/safety from catastrophic risk.
So just a bunch of useless bureaucracy to act as a moat to competition. The current generation of models is nowhere close to being capable of generating any sort of catastrophic outcome.
- lukeplato 1y agoI think an unrestricted model with sufficient inference time compute could create unprecedented catastrophes. Not sure why you would be opposed to whistleblower protections
- vorpalhex 1y agoBecause those models already exist and can be run on consumer available hardware with no real issues. All this does is create barriers for Anthropic competitors.