4 ms·

I love using emojis but can't stand what it has turned into. I have a Boomer opinion when it comes to emojis: there are just too many. At some point we need t

I love using emojis but can't stand what it has turned into. I have a Boomer opinion when it comes to emojis: there are just too many. At some point we need to cut a lot of emojis or come up with a better way to insert them into conversations. We are at nearly 4,000 emojis. Scrolling through a list is bad UX, remembering or trying to think of keywords to pull one up is bad UX. I think we could cut it down to 2,000 easily, no one would notice. I would venture to guess that 98% of all emoji usage is contained to 200 emojis with these very esoteric emojis getting no usage outside of accidental or emoji spam/copy-pasta. Here's _my_ proposal: We have a list of deletions. Every year, if an emoji is not used above a certain threshold, it's deleted permanently and the concept of the emoji is banned for 5 years.

dingnuts 1y ago
> Every year, if an emoji is not used enough, it's deleted. This would be like deleting kanji, and would also require perfect surveillance of everyone's devices. If you want Chat Control you don't have to hide behind weird recommendations about emoji
- madamelic 1y ago
  The proposal was tongue-in-cheek but the sentiment remains. There are way too many emojis and we should figure out a way to cull the herd.
- mmastrac 1y ago
  You could easily do a zero-knowledge proof thing where you transmit a bitmask of emoji used over the next 365 days, with N bits randomly permuted. In aggregate, you'd still be able to count usage without saying definitively someone used or didn't use a particular emoji.
miloignis 1y ago
This feels more like a proposal for whatever emoji-picker you're using than for Unicode - I don't use most of the scripts defined by Unicode, and I don't use most of the emoji either. No one is forcing me to use every Unicode codepoint. Them being defined is only a benefit to me if I do happen to need to use them, say to copy-paste Sanskrit to translate it, or if I want to make a joke about bigfoot with an emoji punchline.
shafoshaf 1y ago
I basically still only use :), :(, and :P. I also have to "undo" it when they switch my chars to an actual emoji. The only one I wish were easier to show is ¯\\(ツ)/¯
- zahrc 1y ago
  shrugs and walks off
- ctippett 1y ago
  Apple's text replacement feature is perfect for this. I have a bunch of ascii emojis that auto-complete for me when I type a matching string (I've based mine on the old BB Code emoticon syntax[1]), e.g. :shrug: → ¯\\(ツ)/¯ (as it happens I also have a text replacement that converts -> into an arrow). [1] https://tl.net/forum/smilies.php https://tl.net/forum/smilies.php
eviks 1y ago
2000 vs 4000 makes no difference for the UI of a picker, and you can have your recently used/favorites with your 200 in the picker to avoid the long scroll

dingnuts 1y ago

> Every year, if an emoji is not used enough, it's deleted. This would be like deleting kanji, and would also require perfect surveillance of everyone's devices. If you want Chat Control you don't have to hide behind weird recommendations about emoji

madamelic 1y ago
The proposal was tongue-in-cheek but the sentiment remains. There are way too many emojis and we should figure out a way to cull the herd.
mmastrac 1y ago
You could easily do a zero-knowledge proof thing where you transmit a bitmask of emoji used over the next 365 days, with N bits randomly permuted. In aggregate, you'd still be able to count usage without saying definitively someone used or didn't use a particular emoji.

miloignis 1y ago

This feels more like a proposal for whatever emoji-picker you're using than for Unicode - I don't use most of the scripts defined by Unicode, and I don't use most of the emoji either. No one is forcing me to use every Unicode codepoint. Them being defined is only a benefit to me if I do happen to need to use them, say to copy-paste Sanskrit to translate it, or if I want to make a joke about bigfoot with an emoji punchline.

shafoshaf 1y ago

I basically still only use :), :(, and :P. I also have to "undo" it when they switch my chars to an actual emoji. The only one I wish were easier to show is ¯\\(ツ)/¯

zahrc 1y ago
shrugs and walks off
ctippett 1y ago
Apple's text replacement feature is perfect for this. I have a bunch of ascii emojis that auto-complete for me when I type a matching string (I've based mine on the old BB Code emoticon syntax[1]), e.g. :shrug: → ¯\\(ツ)/¯ (as it happens I also have a text replacement that converts -> into an arrow). [1] https://tl.net/forum/smilies.php https://tl.net/forum/smilies.php

eviks 1y ago

2000 vs 4000 makes no difference for the UI of a picker, and you can have your recently used/favorites with your 200 in the picker to avoid the long scroll