4 ms·

Purely subjective, but way too big. They look ridiculous on anyone smaller than 6’5 275.

• ycombinete 1y ago
  Case in point from the article: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/images/2025/09/introducing-apple-watch-ultra-3/article/Apple-Watch-Ultra-3-hypertension-notification-250909_big.jpg.small_2x.jpg https://www.apple.com/newsroom/images/2025/09/introducing-ap...
• Insanity 1y ago
  Yup, I would be in the market for an Ultra if it wasn't so large lol.
• AlanYx 1y ago
  It's strange that Apple keeps pushing large watches, given how sensitive they are to design trends. Among traditional non-smart watches, things have started to reverse in the last couple years, with 36mm-39mm watches enjoying a resurgence in popularity.
  • drdaeman 1y ago
    My guess is that they can't make it battery efficient (non-Ultra watches barely survive a day just showing a watchface and whirring at notifications, with widgets severely lagging in updates due to extremely tight budgets: e.g. weather forecast is nearly always out of date for me, I use the widget to open the app and force it to refresh to get anything accurate), so they're pushing towards bulkier packaging under the guise of ruggedness.
• quickthrowman 1y ago
  Agreed, a 46mm x 40mm watch face is absolutely massive, you’d need 8”+ wrists to have it look right. It would look like a hockey puck if I tried it on right after removing my 36mm automatic, but I have 6.25” wrists. It’s approaching the size of the (in)famous Diesel ‘Mr Daddy’ watches lol: https://shop.diesel.com/en/man/watches/mr-daddy/ https://shop.diesel.com/en/man/watches/mr-daddy/