Sure, it's how I see them. My view of them has been pretty good for me personally, for predicting what they're going to do, though. I'm sure they have consider

Sure, it's how I see them. My view of them has been pretty good for me personally, for predicting what they're going to do, though. I'm sure they have considered a very limited number of mitigations, but nothing radical. But they always end up with the default choice. Do you disagree? If so, tell me when they did something the slightest bit imaginative or radical, or even surprising. I don't think you even disagree with me, you just think it's good that they don't. > Why would we not embrace an open and free market. Because it's not actually on the table when dealing with Trump?