26 ms·
BBC: "Supreme Court lifts limits on LA immigration raids" PBS: "Supreme Court ends restrictions on LA immigration stops set after agents swept up U.S. citizens
by aredox 1y ago
BBC: "Supreme Court lifts limits on LA immigration raids"
PBS: "Supreme Court ends restrictions on LA immigration stops set after agents swept up U.S. citizens"
Politico: "Supreme Court lifts restrictions on ‘roving’ ICE raids in Los Angeles"
WaPo: "Supreme Court lifts limits on immigration raids in the Los Angeles area"
And in practice:
ABC: "Immigrants in Southern California go on high alert after Supreme Court ruling
If you have any knowledge of what is happening on the ground, it fully represents the consequence of the opinions:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/us/politics/supreme-court-immigration-racial-profiling.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/us/politics/supreme-court...
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoAll of those headlines are accurate. (Some, more to the point than this article's.) "Allows racial targeting" is not.
- aredox 1y agoYou are nitpicking. The Supreme Court is allowing racial targeting right now. It is happening, right now. People are being roughhandled, thrown to the ground, handcuffed right now. People are going missing from their families right now, for the "crime" of having non-white skin, speaking Spanish and working menial jobs. The fact that they will make a decision a posteriori about it (in, what, several months? Maybe? There isn't any deadline after the Sept. 24th hearing) doesn't change the fact racial profiling is happening at this very hour because the Supreme Court took the action to go against a lower court that stopped it. You are splitting hairs and playing with words from the comfort of your comfortable armchair, free from any personal concern, with no skin in the game, because "ooooh, someone may misunderstand the Supreme Court's decision scope and breadth, we can't allow that to happen".