2 ms·
You are only half reading the news. Yes, revisions are valid and happen. Yes, a look at historical revisions don't show any bias. But where are you seeing tha
by itsoktocry 1y ago
You are only half reading the news.
Yes, revisions are valid and happen. Yes, a look at historical revisions don't show any bias.
But where are you seeing that half made Trump look good?
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesnaicsrev.htm https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesnaicsrev.htm
- axus 1y agoBiden was the previous administration.
- teemur 1y agoThe whole of trumps first stint? For this year's numbers there are two possible stories that come to my mind: 1. The jobs are going ~constantly downhill and any new, revised number is going to be worse than previous 2. There is a conspiracy and initially the numbers are systematically inflated and/or afterwards deflated because reasons... that are completely incomprehensible to me. I don't even understand if this conspiracy theory should be pro or against trump.
- itsoktocry 1y ago>The whole of trumps first stint? Is it hard to imagine a world where things from 10 years ago aren't the same as today? Can you not see that politicians will do anything to win? Biggest downward revision ever recorded this morning, by the way.