2 ms·
That explanation sounds fishy to me. If something doesn't work then there's no need to ban it.
by MichaelDickens 1y ago
That explanation sounds fishy to me. If something doesn't work then there's no need to ban it.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> If something doesn't work then there's no need to ban it Did you read the article? Chemical weapons provide no benefit to a modern army. They do, however, to simpler armies. So the world's militaries, who command modern armies, came together and banned them. Put another way, the U.S. military gains nothing from chemical weapons over high explosives. The Taliban, on the other hand, might.
- martin-t 1y agoIn addition to what the other commenter said, it's virtue signaling.