4 ms·
Having worked in a (very) privacy-sensitive environment, the quality of the hosted foundation models are still vastly superior to any open weight model for prac
by just_human 1y ago
Having worked in a (very) privacy-sensitive environment, the quality of the hosted foundation models are still vastly superior to any open weight model for practical tasks. The foundation model companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc) are willing to sign deals with enterprises that offer reasonable protections and keep sensitive data secure, so I don't think privacy or security is a reason why enterprises would shift to open weight models.
That said, I think there is a lot of adoption of open weight for cost-sensitive features built into applications. But i'd argue this is due cost, not privacy.
- briansun 1y agoThanks for the view from a very privacy‑sensitive environment — agreed that hosted SOTA still leads on broad capability. Could you share a quick split: which tasks truly require hosted SOTA than open‑weight? I think gpt-oss is quite good for a lot of things. SMBs can’t get enterprise contracts with OpenAI/Anthropic, so local/open‑weight may be their only viable path — or wait for a hybrid plan.