4 ms·

i’m pretty sure that’s a standard requirement.. or at least extremely similar to how Brazil does it and i think similar for lots of EU countries

• alephnerd 1y ago
  The difference is, you can trust an EU country isn't filing a claim to put down a color revolution or that you can appeal via the judiciary. A hybrid regime like Nepal is not like that.
  • whimsicalism 1y ago
    I don’t agree and I think EU countries have shown they are more than willing to trample over free communication to maintain their “cordon sanitaire” as well as a certain PoV on Israel. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/telegram-founder-says-he-rejects-request-silence-conservative-voices-romania-2025-05-18/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/telegram-founder-says-h...
    • JumpCrisscross 1y ago
      EU members have an independent judiciary. Nepal does not. The local rep would be a whipping boy in a way they wouldn’t in the EU.
      • RugnirViking 1y ago
        Have you seen how public polls on the judiciary have changed in just the past 5 years? People do not believe our institutions work. Though the judiciary may be independent, people believe that it is cut of the same cloth -- elite schools, disconnect from normal life
        • JumpCrisscross 1y ago
          > Have you seen how public polls on the judiciary have changed in just the past 5 years? For the EU? Genuinely, no. Curious for a source.