glibc's allocator is about 10x more code than musl's. Why should it be controversial that different C stdlib implementations set different priorities? A smalle

glibc's allocator is about 10x more code than musl's. Why should it be controversial that different C stdlib implementations set different priorities? A smaller code base also means a smaller attack surface and fewer potential bugs. The question remains: why does the Rust ecosystem depend so much on a system component they ultimately have no control over?