12 ms·
Ah yes, the "you're holding it wrong" argument. If other allocators are able to handle a situation perfectly well, even a general-purpose allocator like the on
by kelnos 1y ago
Ah yes, the "you're holding it wrong" argument.
If other allocators are able to handle a situation perfectly well, even a general-purpose allocator like the one in glibc, that suggests that musl's is deficient.
- flohofwoe 1y agoglibc's allocator is about 10x more code than musl's. Why should it be controversial that different C stdlib implementations set different priorities? A smaller code base also means a smaller attack surface and fewer potential bugs. The question remains: why does the Rust ecosystem depend so much on a system component they ultimately have no control over?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]