4 ms·
For most Americans, that is full cost for an iPhone. Even though it's technically the cost with a contract, I'd wager that 98% of all people who purchase iPhone
by benihana 14y ago
For most Americans, that is full cost for an iPhone. Even though it's technically the cost with a contract, I'd wager that 98% of all people who purchase iPhones purchase them subsidized by carriers with contracts.
- mikeryan 14y agoFor most Americans, that is full cost for an iPhone. Not really, thats the full price of a phone and a plan, its still a subsidized price, and Apple is still providing a discount by offering replacements for $199. Try losing a phone while 1 year into a plan and its going to cost you $300-500 to replace it.
- runjake 14y agoSo? What's your point? The alternative is you buy a Samsung android phone or whatever and break it and end up paying the actual cost, which is normally $499 on the low end to $649 for the latest flagship phones. A $199 replacement cost for a mistake I made sounds like a heck of a deal.
- chc 14y agoNo, the alternative is you buy a $20 case so your phone doesn't get damaged by a four-foot drop. If you look four posts up, that was the topic of this thread.
- enraged_camel 14y agoDoesn't sound like a very good alternative. You're paying 10% of the cost of the phone to protect it against (some) accidents, but in the process set it back a generation, by making it thicker and heavier. That's pretty costly as far as insurance goes.
- mikeash 14y agoOnly if you place a high priority on thickness. I personally don't, and am actually fairly annoyed that cell phone makers don't have the option to e.g. double the thickness of their phones in exchange for a 2-3x increase in battery life.
- TylerE 14y agoThe thickness of a case doesn't bother me. The ridge around the edge of the screen does.
- enraged_camel 14y ago>>Only if you place a high priority on thickness. Most people do. This is why smartphones have been getting thinner with each iteration.
- mikeash 14y agoOf course. My point is only that people don't all have the same priorities. If you strongly value thickness, a case is not a good choice. If you don't care, then a case is a good choice. Making a blanket declaration that a case is "pretty costly as far as insurance goes" regardless of personal preferences is stupid.
- Dobbs 14y agoThey have this, it is called a Mophie Juice Pack[1]. They have two sizes with different battery extensions. I miss the thinness of my phone without the case but greatly prefer being able to get through a day in the data center or traveling without constantly charging my phone. 1: http://www.mophie.com/mophie-juice-pack-air-iPhone-4-4s-battery-case-p/1145_jpa-ip4-blk.htm http://www.mophie.com/mophie-juice-pack-air-iPhone-4-4s-batt...
- chc 14y agoYou can get keychain fob chargers to charge your phone in your pocket when you need it and keep the thinness the rest of the time.
- vlisivka 14y agoI fall from bike with phone near to my ear on concrete road, so I smashed it with acceleration, but it is hard to see the dent on it case, despite that it is very heavy phone with hardware keyboard. I use Motorola Cliq with Cyanogen. My previous Motorola A1200 survived lot of drops too, still working perfectly. My next phone will be Motorola. :-)
- tobylane 14y agoThat's annoying blindness. I'm considering a contract that (for the 4S as the latest) is £900 in total, I'd happily go without a case and be prepared to pay £200 for a break.
- mhenr18 14y agoWow, there's actually an upfront cost in the US? I never paid a cent for mine - it was 100% subsidised (and you could have gotten the same plan for the same cost but without the phone, so this really was 100%).