4 ms·
Interesting, you do think the local populace is not capable of breeding? If so, can you point to the why? I might be leading you a little, but I promise only a
by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 1y ago
Interesting, you do think the local populace is not capable of breeding? If so, can you point to the why? I might be leading you a little, but I promise only a little.
- crooked-v 1y agoThe US has a fertility rate of 1.6 (https://apnews.com/article/fertility-rate-us-low-cdc-replacement-532c4f43f420f29b32212db9cfa0e0af https://apnews.com/article/fertility-rate-us-low-cdc-replace...), i.e., 1.6 kids per 2 parents. Better social services and social safety nets would likely increase this some, but it would still probably be under 2, since that's the general trend for wealthy countries.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 1y agoInteresting way to sidestep the answer, because I did not ask you what the current rate is. I asked you why you think the existing population cannot breed. If it is social services and social safety net, then why the same does not apply to the immigrant population ( legal or illegal )? Again, I know what I am thinking, but you have to give me a little more so that I model your world perspective a little more clearly.
- crooked-v 1y agoI'm not going to bother with dealing with the leading questions crap. The factual argument is already laid out; engage with it or go away.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 1y ago[flagged]
- tootie 1y agoThe argument above is pretty clear. Fertility is below replacement. You say it could be higher. Sure it could be but it isn't. We could also all stop committing crimes and send the police home.
- tootie 1y agoOpposite actually. Prosperity and security decrease fertility. Go look at the most developed nations is Europe and Asia and they have lower fertility than the US. America is only hanging on due to latent religious fervor (and immigration).