5 ms·

I Hate Open Source Software - Why Open Source Sucks

11 points by saurabh 14y ago

bediger4000 14y ago
This is so wrong it isn't even false. Direct experience contradicts every single assertion GrumpyNerd makes.
- smacktoward 14y ago
  Remember Ruby back in 2006? (Or just Rails if you’re a cool dork) oh you couldn’t turn a corner without some douche-canoe evangelizing the wonders of this horrible little fad framework and how it was going to revolutionize delivering software and services to the web and like the Segway Scooter of computer science… BAM in 2011 no one uses it. Nobody was using Ruby in 2011? Really? Really? It's not even worth going through and picking out all the mistakes, really. I feel bad about even having taken the time to pick out the one above. It's like beating up the fat kid on the playground.
dtwhitney 14y ago
Not sure if this is meant to be funny, but it is in any case
chmod775 14y ago
I realized it's satire after this paragraph: “Well Grumpy Nerd maybe you’re just not smart enough for Linux…”
- SwearWord 14y ago
  It's not satire
runjake 14y ago
Not everyone has the grace and skill of Maddox; this person, trying to emulate Maddox, being one of them.
fein 14y ago
This wouldn't be so hysterical if I didn't have a guy in my office that has made every single one of these arguments in the past. and this gem: >Flaviu Flav: >Are you still wearing those clocks around your neck? Those were fly. I love it when the lines between satire and reality blur into an indistinguishable smudge.
Codhisattva 14y ago
To expand on the 2nd type of open source software - corporations love FOSS because they get a huge amount of value at little cost. FOSS coders undervalue themselves and should get paid what they are worth. Don't believe that? Ask Apache how many companies that rely on httpd for their entire revenue stream have contributed anything at all.
- mpyne 14y ago
  > FOSS coders undervalue themselves and should get paid what they are worth. I do open-source coding with a completely non-related day job to keep proficient and because I like building software. What should I bill per hour? Who should I bill it to? As far as I'm concerned I'm already making value from my code, I certainly don't need others swooping in to tell me what I should and shouldn't charge for it.
highace 14y ago
This is great. "Open Source nerds don’t have the discipline to write documentation because it’s no fun. Writing new code is fun." - as I discovered when trying to learn how to use the last 2 open source frameworks I came across.
- smacktoward 14y ago
  This would be a more compelling complaint if proprietary software generally came with detailed, clearly written documentation. Which most of the time it doesn't. In the worst cases, the proprietary software vendor expects you to pay to get access to the kind of not-end-user-oriented-but-still-useful documentation (like an API reference) that open source projects publish for free. In other words, it's not that open source software tends to be poorly documented, it's that software tends to be poorly documented. At least with open source software you can go and look and the source code to figure out the stuff the docs leave out.
  - ChuckMcM 14y ago
    I'd settle for some documentation on libdrm and libkms
  - snogglethorpe 14y ago
    My complaint with a lot of proprietary documentation is that although it exists, it's often almost information free... E.g., for a function called "void ReverseDirection (x)", the doc says "Reverses the direction of X", without any mention of context, possible issues, subtleties, ... just a mechanical statement of the obvious.
joyinsky 14y ago
Is stupid not to use it given sometimes is high quality and it's free. There is nothing cheaper than FREE!
MetaCosm 14y ago
I can't wait for his Metro review. As that article was year+ old -- his Metro rage shall be epic.
GrumpyNerd 14y ago
Peasants, Grumpy Nerd likes it when you link the indisputable brilliance of his blog from this shitpile of a website. -Grumpy

11 points by saurabh 14y ago

bediger4000 14y ago

This is so wrong it isn't even false. Direct experience contradicts every single assertion GrumpyNerd makes.

smacktoward 14y ago
Remember Ruby back in 2006? (Or just Rails if you’re a cool dork) oh you couldn’t turn a corner without some douche-canoe evangelizing the wonders of this horrible little fad framework and how it was going to revolutionize delivering software and services to the web and like the Segway Scooter of computer science… BAM in 2011 no one uses it. Nobody was using Ruby in 2011? Really? Really? It's not even worth going through and picking out all the mistakes, really. I feel bad about even having taken the time to pick out the one above. It's like beating up the fat kid on the playground.

dtwhitney 14y ago

Not sure if this is meant to be funny, but it is in any case

chmod775 14y ago

I realized it's satire after this paragraph: “Well Grumpy Nerd maybe you’re just not smart enough for Linux…”

SwearWord 14y ago
It's not satire

runjake 14y ago

Not everyone has the grace and skill of Maddox; this person, trying to emulate Maddox, being one of them.

fein 14y ago

This wouldn't be so hysterical if I didn't have a guy in my office that has made every single one of these arguments in the past. and this gem: >Flaviu Flav: >Are you still wearing those clocks around your neck? Those were fly. I love it when the lines between satire and reality blur into an indistinguishable smudge.

Codhisattva 14y ago

To expand on the 2nd type of open source software - corporations love FOSS because they get a huge amount of value at little cost. FOSS coders undervalue themselves and should get paid what they are worth. Don't believe that? Ask Apache how many companies that rely on httpd for their entire revenue stream have contributed anything at all.

mpyne 14y ago
> FOSS coders undervalue themselves and should get paid what they are worth. I do open-source coding with a completely non-related day job to keep proficient and because I like building software. What should I bill per hour? Who should I bill it to? As far as I'm concerned I'm already making value from my code, I certainly don't need others swooping in to tell me what I should and shouldn't charge for it.

highace 14y ago

This is great. "Open Source nerds don’t have the discipline to write documentation because it’s no fun. Writing new code is fun." - as I discovered when trying to learn how to use the last 2 open source frameworks I came across.

smacktoward 14y ago
This would be a more compelling complaint if proprietary software generally came with detailed, clearly written documentation. Which most of the time it doesn't. In the worst cases, the proprietary software vendor expects you to pay to get access to the kind of not-end-user-oriented-but-still-useful documentation (like an API reference) that open source projects publish for free. In other words, it's not that open source software tends to be poorly documented, it's that software tends to be poorly documented. At least with open source software you can go and look and the source code to figure out the stuff the docs leave out.
- ChuckMcM 14y ago
  I'd settle for some documentation on libdrm and libkms
- snogglethorpe 14y ago
  My complaint with a lot of proprietary documentation is that although it exists, it's often almost information free... E.g., for a function called "void ReverseDirection (x)", the doc says "Reverses the direction of X", without any mention of context, possible issues, subtleties, ... just a mechanical statement of the obvious.

joyinsky 14y ago

Is stupid not to use it given sometimes is high quality and it's free. There is nothing cheaper than FREE!

MetaCosm 14y ago

I can't wait for his Metro review. As that article was year+ old -- his Metro rage shall be epic.

GrumpyNerd 14y ago

Peasants, Grumpy Nerd likes it when you link the indisputable brilliance of his blog from this shitpile of a website. -Grumpy