3 ms·

doesn't look like it to me

• josephcsible 1y ago
  https://x.com/samhenrigold/status/1964464940049453153 https://x.com/samhenrigold/status/1964464940049453153
  • nixosbestos 1y ago
    [flagged]
    • pmarreck 1y ago
      Not only can you just replace twitter.com with nitter.net, I bet there's a browser extension you can get (or generate in 1 minute with any LLM) that would load any Twitter link into Nitter. https://nitter.net/samhenrigold/status/1964464940049453153 https://nitter.net/samhenrigold/status/1964464940049453153
      • gapan 1y ago
        That works despite twitter though, not because of it. It is ultimately an argument against twitter.
        • pmarreck 1y ago
          Plenty of people put their content behind paywalls, but apparently, someone who puts theirs behind a free loginwall is a bridge too far? I'm not sure I understand the outrage. I can't stand Bluesky, but I have an account on it. What the fuck is the big deal?
          • gapan 1y ago
            Whataboutism. Look it up.
            • pmarreck 1y ago
              It's a comparison, not whataboutism, and you still didn't answer the question.
      • nixosbestos 1y ago
        [flagged]
  • pavel_lishin 1y ago
    But you can only see replies to tweets if you're logged in; so thank you for providing that link, but currently, that's the only way that those of us who aren't logged into Twitter can find it.