22 ms·
Well studies like this are often directed at policymakers, who actually can do something about it.
by ajkjk 1y ago
Well studies like this are often directed at policymakers, who actually can do something about it.
- FollowingTheDao 1y agoAnd lobbyists are also directed at those policy makers...which is the bigger problem. Big spikes in soft money group spending in 22 and 24 elections... https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?cycle=2024&ind=E01 https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?cycle=2024&ind=...
- lazide 1y agoPolicy makers generally only give a damn if someone else makes them - or they get something from it.
- tim333 1y agoThey can do the old fashioned make things better to make the voters happy and get reelected. In London the mayor has brought in a lot of anti pollution measures and although the tabloids and right wing media go on about how awful he is, he gets reelected, including my voting. This thing says roadside ppm2.5 is down from 17 to 8 in central where I live https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/07/london-air-pollution-down-since-ulez-expansion-study https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/07/london-a...
- ajkjk 1y agoThat's the cynical take, but as far as I can tell it is far from universally true. You just hear about all the bad cases. Not to mention, the the way it pulls on policy can be much more subtle than getting bills passed.