3 ms·

Reopen by constructing and assigning a new socket.

• spacechild1 1y ago
  So I essentially have to wrap it in something like std::optional. Well, that's certainly one way to write a socket class, but I'd say it's not idiomatic C++. (I have never seen a socket class being implemented like that.)
  • sgsjchs 1y ago
    You don't need optional in this case, the assignment would just destroy the old socket and immediately move the new one in its place.
    • spacechild1 1y ago
      Well, reopening a socket implies that I have manually closed the socket, which does require an optional with your implementation.