4 ms·
The interpretation is probably up for some debate especially since meeting details are not public, but some relevant links are: - The P3390R0 Safe C++ proposal
by aw1621107 1y ago
The interpretation is probably up for some debate especially since meeting details are not public, but some relevant links are:
- The P3390R0 Safe C++ proposal and the related vote in the 2024-11 Wrocław meeting: https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2045 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2045
- The adoption of the paper P3466 R1 (Re)affirm design principles for future C++ evolution at the same meeting, which contains language which can be interpreted as preemptively foreclosing a Safe C++-style approach: https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2121 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2121
- tialaramex 1y agoP3466 resulted in a new Standing Document for the committee. SD-10 https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-10-language-evolution-principles https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-10-language-evo... The idea in this document was to write down "principles" of the C++ language without regard to annoying facts which might put those principles in doubt.