4 ms·
>dropping support for CPUs that are only a few years old Isn't it only 2017 CPUs and older? So that's at least ~9 years of free updates (free updates stop at t
by whyoh 1y ago
>dropping support for CPUs that are only a few years old
Isn't it only 2017 CPUs and older? So that's at least ~9 years of free updates (free updates stop at the end of 2026 with the extension), which is frankly better than most other OSs.
If you include paid ESU updates it's at least ~11 years and if you include LTSC it's even way longer than that.
There are many things we can complain about when it comes to Windows, but I wouldn't say long term support is one of them. It's generally better than macOS or Linux distros, not to mention smartphones.
- troupo 1y ago> Isn't it only 2017 CPUs and older? So that's at least ~9 years of free updates (free updates stop at the end of 2026 with the extension), which is frankly better than most other OSs. That's the indictment of the industry, not a praise for Microsoft.
- joshuaissac 1y agoAMD themselves ended support for these CPUs a year ago, so it is reasonable for third parties to also do so.
- troupo 1y agoUnsurprisingly, my point still stands
- SSLy 1y ago> Isn't it only 2017 CPUs and older? MSFT lies to our face about not supporting Kaby Lake, except the one single CPU that was sold in Surfaces when W11 was announced. What an coincidence.