3 ms·
algorithmic complexity is 100% absolutely orthogonal to the stuff you've mentioned what you're describing is something different than big-o, in the sense that
by kiitos 1y ago
algorithmic complexity is 100% absolutely orthogonal to the stuff you've mentioned
what you're describing is something different than big-o, in the sense that is commonly understood, and what your interviewer almost certainly intended
I understand what you're describing and talking about but it's not big-o
I would guess that you haven't had any kind of formal cs education? no shade but like there are some important topics covered in those curriculums
- nomel 1y agoI have. I understand big-o, I understand that it’s just algorithmic complexity. I understand big-o is not a performance scaling model, because algorithms run on real hardware. That's fine. Some people enjoy petting spherical cows, and some people work with the nuances of reality. That's also fine.
- kristopolous 1y agoBut none of that is the point. This was at a well funded company looking for a high scalability engineer. So excuse me for thinking that's what they're looking for and answering accordingly. I literally only wanted to work there to team build, then snipe engineers and spin off into my own thing. So whatever.
- kiitos 1y agolooks like both you and they dodged bullets in this outcome, so all worked out in the end