3 ms·
This isn't specific to racket, any implementation of R6RS scheme should fully support this, although the define-syntax form is slightly different. I checked th
by maplant 1y ago
This isn't specific to racket, any implementation of R6RS scheme should fully support this, although the define-syntax form is slightly different.
I checked this with my R6RS implementation and it works just as you would expect (https://github.com/maplant/scheme-rs https://github.com/maplant/scheme-rs)
- valorzard 1y agoHow close are you to getting a "full" implementation of R6RS? I've been thinking of picking either your project or Steel[0] for a Rust Scheme thing [0] https://github.com/mattwparas/steel https://github.com/mattwparas/steel
- maplant 1y agoI’m hoping by the end of the year. All of the “difficult” things are finished (control flow, syntax transformers, call/cc, dynamic wind, exceptions, libraries, etc) and it’s just a matter of filling missing base library functions. If there’s something in particular that you need you’re welcome to file and issue or post a message on the discord and I’ll prioritize it. That being said, Steel is excellent and I highly recommend it if you just need R5RS with syntax transformers
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- skrishnamurthi 1y agoWow — scheme-rs is such a neat project! Hadn't heard of it before!
- maplant 1y agoThanks! I haven’t really publicized it, my goal is to get it finished first, but I will be presenting on it at the scheme workshop at ICFP/SPLASH
- skrishnamurthi 1y agoNeat! Will see if I can make it (though I'll probably have to be dealing with OOPSLA stuff at the same time )-:).