4 ms·
I think it's coming from both places, it's just that the top-down exhortations are so loud and insistent. I wasn't around to experience it but my understanding
by nlawalker 1y ago
I think it's coming from both places, it's just that the top-down exhortations are so loud and insistent.
I wasn't around to experience it but my understanding is that this is what happened in the 90's with object oriented programming - it was a legitimately useful idea that had some real grassroots traction and good uses, but it got sold to non-technical leadership as a silver bullet for productivity through reuse.
The problem then, as it is now, is that developer productivity is hard to measure, so if management gets sold on something that's "guaranteed" to boost it, it becomes a mandate and a proxy measure.
- bink 1y agoI think that's a good comparison. I was around in the 90s and I do remember OOP being pushed by all sorts of people who weren't coders. It was being pushed as the "proper" way to code regardless of the language, size, platform, or purpose of the program in question.