3 ms·
That is a farily broad statement. How would you reconcile your statement against state laws that require all-party consent for audio recordings? e.g. CISA, or
by nycpig 1y ago
That is a farily broad statement.
How would you reconcile your statement against state laws that require all-party consent for audio recordings? e.g. CISA, or FSCA
- nerdsniper 1y agoThose don’t apply to public spaces in the USA. This is super well-established law. If you needed consent to record in public there would be nearly zero YouTube videos recorded in public. And security cameras would generally not be allowed to record audio. And Tesla’s “Sentry mode” would be illegal. In the USA, there is no right or legal expectation of privacy in public spaces, which includes fast food restaurants that are open to the public (indoors or outdoors) Edit: Another commenter has made me aware that some states do ban non-consensual audio recordings in public: https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/massachusetts-recording-law https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/massachusetts-recording-law The laws prohibiting these recordings have neither been upheld nor overturned by the US Supreme Court.
- redserk 1y agoSentry mode doesn’t record audio.