3 ms·
There is a way to state Parson's point which avoids this issue: hallucinations are just as much a consequence of the LLM working as designed as are correct stat
by mannykannot 1y ago
There is a way to state Parson's point which avoids this issue: hallucinations are just as much a consequence of the LLM working as designed as are correct statements.
- throwawaymaths 1y agofine. which part is the problem?
- johnnyanmac 1y agoThe part where it can't admit situations where there's not enough data/training to admit it doesn't know. I'm a bit surprised no one talks about this factor. It's like talking to a giant narcissist who can Google really fast but not understand what it reads. The ability to admit ignorance is a major factor of credibility, because none of us know everything all at once.
- throwawaymaths 1y agoyeah sorry i mean which part of the architecture. "working as designed"
- mannykannot 1y agoI suppose you are aware that, for many uses of LLMs, the propensity for hallucinating is a problem (especially if this is not properly taken into account by the people hoping to use these LLMs), but this then leaves me puzzled about what you are asking here.