3 ms·

> knowledge should be free As soo as OpenAI open sources their model's source code I'll agree.

• 3836293648 1y ago
  And weights
  • rvnx 1y ago
    Isn’t it the mission of non-profit “Open”AI and Anthropic “Public Benefit Corporation”, right ?
• mdp2021 1y ago
  That is an elision for "public knowledge". Of course there are nuances. In the case of books, there is little doubt: printed for sale is literally named "published". (The "for sale" side does not limit the purpose to sales only, before somebody wants to attack that.)
  • LunaSea 1y ago
    Books are private objects sold to buyers. By definition, its not public knowledge.
    • mdp2021 1y ago
      Again and again: the "book", the item, is a private object, access to the text is freely available - to those member of societies that have decided that knowledge be freely available and have thus established libraries. (They have collected the books - their own - so that we can freely access the texts.)