3 ms·

This is the explanation from the White House: > The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world. The name “Department of War,” mo

This is the explanation from the White House: > The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world. The name “Department of War,” more than the current “Department of Defense,” ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend. This name sharpens the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what is ours. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restoring-the-united-states-department-of-war/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/rest...

AnimalMuppet 1y ago
The name doesn't ensure anything. But all right, it's intended (at face value) to say "we will attack, not just defend". Interesting.
- jerlam 1y ago
  The only people who would notice the name change are people in the US, not its enemies. The previous name clearly hasn't stopped the US from initiating wars, nor would other countries notice the difference.
  - bravetraveler 1y ago
    In another word, performative
  - frugalmail 1y ago
    I'm pretty sure China, Russia, N. Korea, Iran, and Venezuela noticed, and noticed hard. After all we noticed Venezuela's Jets encroaching on our navel vessels, and the China exhibition of might and technology w/ sidecars of Russia, N. Korea, and India. And Iran's distributed re-building post their nuclear facility setbacks.
    - throw0101c 1y ago
      > I'm pretty sure China, Russia, N. Korea, Iran, and Venezuela noticed, and noticed hard. LOL. I'm sure they also noticed that the VP and SECDEF did operational planning on commercial phones: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group_chat_leaks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group... It was named the DoD under Truman, who served in WW1 and was involved (at the tail end) of WW2 and the initial stages of the Cold War. After which the following Presidents had no problem with it Eisenhower (SCHAEF), JFK (WW2 veteran; Purple Heart), LBJ (WW2 veteran; Silver Star), Nixon (WW2 veteran), Ford and Carter and Bush 41 (veterans). This is immature posturing.
throw0101c 1y ago
> The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world. Meanwhile the folks that had just finished winning WW2 chose "Department of Defence". From Tom Nichols (a now-retired prof at the US Naval War College): > It is almost impossible to overstate the inanity of this move. The United States has a Department of Defense for a reason. It was called the “War” Department until 1947, when the dictates of a new and more dangerous world required the creation of a much larger military organization than any in American history. Harry Truman and the American leaders who destroyed the Axis, and who now were facing the Soviet empire, realized that national security had become a larger undertaking than the previous American tradition of moving, as needed, between discrete conditions of “war” and “peace.” > These leaders understood that America could no longer afford the isolationist luxury of militarizing itself during times of threat and then making soldiers train with wooden sticks when the storm clouds passed. Now, they knew, the security of the country would be a daily undertaking, a matter of ongoing national defense, in which the actual exercise of military force would be only part of preserving the freedom and independence of the United States and its allies. * https://archive.today/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/09/defense-war-cringe-department/684112/ https://archive.today/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/arch... And on previous presidents opinion of the name: > That name was good enough for Truman, who served in combat in World War I and dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan. And it was good enough for President Dwight Eisenhower, the former supreme allied commander, who oversaw the largest military operations ever undertaken in all of human history. > It was also good enough for John F. Kennedy, who served his country as a naval officer and nearly got killed during World War II. It was good enough for Lyndon B. Johnson, who won the Silver Star for his military service, and then, as commander in chief, embroiled the United States in a decade-long war in Southeast Asia. It was good enough for Naval Reserve officer Richard Nixon, who took over Johnson’s war and unleashed the fury of American bombers overseas. It was good enough for Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, both former Navy officers. It was good enough for Ronald Reagan, a former Army officer who as president pushed through a huge program of military expansion and modernization. It was good enough for his successor, George H. W. Bush, a decorated naval aviator who was shot down during combat in the Pacific. * Ibid And Cullen Roche: > I like Department of War. > But only if we change the Fed to Bigly Bank and Dept of Treasury to Ministry of Moolah. * https://twitter.com/cullenroche/status/1964068303715913843#m https://twitter.com/cullenroche/status/1964068303715913843#m

AnimalMuppet 1y ago

The name doesn't ensure anything. But all right, it's intended (at face value) to say "we will attack, not just defend". Interesting.

jerlam 1y ago
The only people who would notice the name change are people in the US, not its enemies. The previous name clearly hasn't stopped the US from initiating wars, nor would other countries notice the difference.
- bravetraveler 1y ago
  In another word, performative
- frugalmail 1y ago
  I'm pretty sure China, Russia, N. Korea, Iran, and Venezuela noticed, and noticed hard. After all we noticed Venezuela's Jets encroaching on our navel vessels, and the China exhibition of might and technology w/ sidecars of Russia, N. Korea, and India. And Iran's distributed re-building post their nuclear facility setbacks.
  - throw0101c 1y ago
    > I'm pretty sure China, Russia, N. Korea, Iran, and Venezuela noticed, and noticed hard. LOL. I'm sure they also noticed that the VP and SECDEF did operational planning on commercial phones: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group_chat_leaks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group... It was named the DoD under Truman, who served in WW1 and was involved (at the tail end) of WW2 and the initial stages of the Cold War. After which the following Presidents had no problem with it Eisenhower (SCHAEF), JFK (WW2 veteran; Purple Heart), LBJ (WW2 veteran; Silver Star), Nixon (WW2 veteran), Ford and Carter and Bush 41 (veterans). This is immature posturing.

throw0101c 1y ago

> The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world. Meanwhile the folks that had just finished winning WW2 chose "Department of Defence". From Tom Nichols (a now-retired prof at the US Naval War College): > It is almost impossible to overstate the inanity of this move. The United States has a Department of Defense for a reason. It was called the “War” Department until 1947, when the dictates of a new and more dangerous world required the creation of a much larger military organization than any in American history. Harry Truman and the American leaders who destroyed the Axis, and who now were facing the Soviet empire, realized that national security had become a larger undertaking than the previous American tradition of moving, as needed, between discrete conditions of “war” and “peace.” > These leaders understood that America could no longer afford the isolationist luxury of militarizing itself during times of threat and then making soldiers train with wooden sticks when the storm clouds passed. Now, they knew, the security of the country would be a daily undertaking, a matter of ongoing national defense, in which the actual exercise of military force would be only part of preserving the freedom and independence of the United States and its allies. * https://archive.today/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/09/defense-war-cringe-department/684112/ https://archive.today/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/arch... And on previous presidents opinion of the name: > That name was good enough for Truman, who served in combat in World War I and dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan. And it was good enough for President Dwight Eisenhower, the former supreme allied commander, who oversaw the largest military operations ever undertaken in all of human history. > It was also good enough for John F. Kennedy, who served his country as a naval officer and nearly got killed during World War II. It was good enough for Lyndon B. Johnson, who won the Silver Star for his military service, and then, as commander in chief, embroiled the United States in a decade-long war in Southeast Asia. It was good enough for Naval Reserve officer Richard Nixon, who took over Johnson’s war and unleashed the fury of American bombers overseas. It was good enough for Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, both former Navy officers. It was good enough for Ronald Reagan, a former Army officer who as president pushed through a huge program of military expansion and modernization. It was good enough for his successor, George H. W. Bush, a decorated naval aviator who was shot down during combat in the Pacific. * Ibid And Cullen Roche: > I like Department of War. > But only if we change the Fed to Bigly Bank and Dept of Treasury to Ministry of Moolah. * https://twitter.com/cullenroche/status/1964068303715913843#m https://twitter.com/cullenroche/status/1964068303715913843#m