When I read this post all I saw were pet theories, sweeping generalizations and assertions with zero supporting evidence, and anecdotes. Not what I expected to

When I read this post all I saw were pet theories, sweeping generalizations and assertions with zero supporting evidence, and anecdotes. Not what I expected to be in the top comment slot of a post that advocates "Go tot [sic] he source. [...] Read actual books and papers. Talk to practitioners." Or maybe I should have expected to see exactly the kind of behavior that OP was complaining about...