3 ms·
The original claim was essentially that humans drive solely based on visual input. That perspective ignores how much past experience and expectation affect per
by opello 1y ago
The original claim was essentially that humans drive solely based on visual input. That perspective ignores how much past experience and expectation affect perception and decision making.
I think I would concede the argument that it's "just processing" once someone has recreated the processing in an automation system. That seems unlikely. Or when an automation system outperforms a human in every situation one might encounter in a chaotic driving environment.
- foobarbecue 1y agoI don't get why you keep bringing processing into a discussion about sensing. It's like someone said "apples come in more colors than lettuce" and you go "no, apples taste better"
- opello 1y agoThis sub-thread discussion is not about sensing but about how humans drive. And for humans, sensing and processing are inexorably linked. Your analogy is a bad-faith definition of orthogonal.
- BurningFrog 1y agoMy original claim was that Teslas have at least as good a visual input system as humans, so that alone can't be a reason they're worse drivers. That's all I meant to say.
- opello 1y ago>> Implying that driving just based on visual input is unsafe, when that is how all humans drive. > ... Teslas have at least as good a visual input system as humans, so that alone can't be a reason they're worse drivers. I don't think that's an accurate description of the original claim. At this point I do wish it had been. This perpetuates the discarding of how past experience affects perception, which seems like part of the "visual input system" of humans to me.