3 ms·
Respectfully, not from my angle! From a purely hardware perspective, I think it's always been in that "limbo" for almost every use case anyway. For a hobbyist
by JohnBooty 1y ago
Respectfully, not from my angle!
From a purely hardware perspective, I think it's always been in that "limbo" for almost every use case anyway.
For a hobbyist even in Ye Olden Days (before there were other single board computers) you were always able to pull up Craiglist or walk to the thrift store and buy a $50 PC that vastly outperformed a Pi anyway. Underclock that PC and it could be a fanless power miser too, albeit not quite down to Pi levels. (Pretty sure I remember people clocking 900mhz P3's down to 500mhz fanless, that kind of thing. Still faster than a O.G. RPi...)
So the Pi's hardware was really only a revelation if you needed that semi-embeddable form factor, or if you wanted to do something like manage a classroom of cheap low-performance PCs without the nightmare of managing a fleet of heterogeneous junk PCs.
It was always all about the objectively awesome ecosystem of support and peripherals, and deciding whether that ecosystem mattered for you and your use case. Sometimes that ecosystem is a massive boon and sometimes it doesn't matter at all.
- JohnBooty 1y agoTangentially, it's always been annoying (and maybe slightly morbidly humorous) how the RPi has always remained a sort of barely-tolerable web browsing machine, even as the hardware's performance has massively increased, because the weight and complexity of web pages has also correspondingly increased.