3 ms·
It's not irony so much as it is brazenly criminal. No one should be in a position of training someone else's AI to replace their job function without consenting
by smt88 1y ago
It's not irony so much as it is brazenly criminal. No one should be in a position of training someone else's AI to replace their job function without consenting to it and without being compensated.
The most valuable thing AI can do right now is write code, and it couldn't do that without thousands of StackOverflow volunteers.
- mlnj 1y agoNo more laws to be enacted on AI in the USA for 10 years thanks to the billionaires. Pouring money into the elections have been a great ROI for the ultra wealthy.
- nickthegreek 1y agothat was removed from the final legislation.
- toader 1y agoWouldn't the language / frameworks documentation be sufficient?
- tjr 1y agoAt what point in the system? If you have an LLM that was trained on (say) everything on the internet except for programming, and then trained it on the Python.org online documentation, would that be enough for it to start programming Python? I've not tried, but I get the impression that it needs to see lots and lots of examples first.
- smt88 1y agoNo, absolutely not. A lot of docs are old, missing code examples, very narrow, etc.