well, the integrated database shell looks nice, specially since it should work against different db systems i think if they limit their focus on have one shell

well, the integrated database shell looks nice, specially since it should work against different db systems i think if they limit their focus on have one shell to replace anything that have a shell ... yet offer a better shell experience, they will have a winner i believe they could be going to too many features so far that those comments comparing it to emacs seem to have a point ...