4 ms·
Yeah, I meant to be clear that 4× was the worst case, and I think it's an impressive achievement already, and perfectly fine for almost everything. After all,
by kragen 1y ago
Yeah, I meant to be clear that 4× was the worst case, and I think it's an impressive achievement already, and perfectly fine for almost everything. After all, running single-threaded software on an 8-core CPU is already an 8× slowdown, right? And people do that all the time!
What's the minimal code size overhead for FUGC?
- pizlonator 1y ago> What's the minimal code size overhead for FUGC? I don’t have good data on this. The FUGC requires the compiler to emit extra metadata and that metadata is hilariously inefficient right now. I haven’t bothered to optimize it. And the FUGC implementation pulls in all of libpas even though it almost certainly doesn’t have to. So I don’t know what minimal looks like right now
- gr4vityWall 1y agoIt's refreshing to see a honest, no-nonsense, not full of marketing-speak reply for once. Your replies on this thread have been great. :)
- kragen 1y agoI see, thanks!