2 ms·
You're not trying very hard to see a side that's different from yours, are you? You are responding to a comment saying "leftist != realistic", yet you seem to b
by PathOfEclipse 1y ago
You're not trying very hard to see a side that's different from yours, are you? You are responding to a comment saying "leftist != realistic", yet you seem to be pretending my intent was to say "here's proof Wikipedia is left-leaning." Neither of my links were given to "prove" bias, either, only to show that accusations of leftwing bias are accusations that Wikipedia is valuing propaganda over truth and objectivity.
Anyways, to get off-topic from my original comment, here's some evidence for you to ignore:
https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-than-ever/ https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-...
https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/is-wikipedia-politically-biased.pdf https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/is...
https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased
https://stophindudvesha.org/the-myth-of-wikipedias-neutrality-unmasking-its-leftist-bias/ https://stophindudvesha.org/the-myth-of-wikipedias-neutralit...
- fnikacevic 1y agoLook if you'd rather trust Fox News than Wikipedia feel free. None of those 4 sources are much convincing of your point.