5 ms·

You're comparing brands and not features here. 1) iOS apps vs. Android apps is subjective 2) My Android has seamless integration to my Samsung TV and home med

by TheCapn 14y ago

You're comparing brands and not features here. 1) iOS apps vs. Android apps is subjective 2) My Android has seamless integration to my Samsung TV and home media as well as laptop and PC via OSS apps and software. Again, we're debating branding at this point whether you want to say your AppleTV is better than my media solution, subjective. Objectively your points about speed and camera are true though. I'm wont deny its a quick phone but I have to agree with others saying it didn't bring anything innovative or new.

Steko 14y ago
"iOS apps vs. Android apps is subjective" True but saying The Dark Knight is better then Clooney Batman is also a subjective judgement. Despite being a subjective judgement, if an overwhelming number of reasonable people agree with something you can comfortably assert it. "didn't bring anything innovative or new" Well console quality graphics will certainly be new if they deliver on this. Wideband audio + beamforming promises superior telephone performance which the iphone has always been sort of meh at. I'm only aware of one phone each that brings either of those (latest evo has HD audio and HTC one has beamforming) and none that have both
- css771 14y ago
  > if an overwhelming number of reasonable people agree with something you can comfortably assert it So you're saying even if the majority is wrong, they're always right?
  - Steko 14y ago
    "majority" =/= "overwhelming number" "always right" =/= "comfortably assert" Nice demonstration of how to construct a straw man though.
    - css771 14y ago
      It's the same principle and you're using it to suppport your subjective claims as fact.
loumf 14y ago
Being able to run an app I want is a feature of my phone. It's all subjective. Even if you have an objective, measurable difference (processor speed), that only matters if I value the difference (subjective) -- which I don't. The iPhone 4S is fast enough for me -- I can't make use of an improvement in speed. I can make use of new iOS apps (and do on almost a daily basis). If there were apps I wanted that needed the iPhone 5 to run, that might persuade me. If a Samsung phone could run iOS apps, then I would choose based on price (probably). If you don't agree, then of course, the iPhone isn't interesting. It's just a glass box with components without the apps. I wouldn't even have a smart phone at all without the App Store.

by TheCapn 14y ago

Steko 14y ago

"iOS apps vs. Android apps is subjective" True but saying The Dark Knight is better then Clooney Batman is also a subjective judgement. Despite being a subjective judgement, if an overwhelming number of reasonable people agree with something you can comfortably assert it. "didn't bring anything innovative or new" Well console quality graphics will certainly be new if they deliver on this. Wideband audio + beamforming promises superior telephone performance which the iphone has always been sort of meh at. I'm only aware of one phone each that brings either of those (latest evo has HD audio and HTC one has beamforming) and none that have both

css771 14y ago
> if an overwhelming number of reasonable people agree with something you can comfortably assert it So you're saying even if the majority is wrong, they're always right?
- Steko 14y ago
  "majority" =/= "overwhelming number" "always right" =/= "comfortably assert" Nice demonstration of how to construct a straw man though.
  - css771 14y ago
    It's the same principle and you're using it to suppport your subjective claims as fact.

loumf 14y ago

Being able to run an app I want is a feature of my phone. It's all subjective. Even if you have an objective, measurable difference (processor speed), that only matters if I value the difference (subjective) -- which I don't. The iPhone 4S is fast enough for me -- I can't make use of an improvement in speed. I can make use of new iOS apps (and do on almost a daily basis). If there were apps I wanted that needed the iPhone 5 to run, that might persuade me. If a Samsung phone could run iOS apps, then I would choose based on price (probably). If you don't agree, then of course, the iPhone isn't interesting. It's just a glass box with components without the apps. I wouldn't even have a smart phone at all without the App Store.