3 ms·
Also, why SM2 instead of FSRS?
by mvieira38 1y ago
Also, why SM2 instead of FSRS?
- bpev 1y agoProbably simplicity. In my experience, SM2 has less levers, and is easier to implement initially.
- jarrett-ye 1y agoSM2 has less parameters, but there is not a systematic way to tweak them correctly. With the optimizer, it's easy to make FSRS adaptive to any learners. There is only one lever for user to tweak in FSRS: the desired retention.