3 ms·
It had been at least 2 years. [] Never became much of a contentious issue until Kamala was looking at the presidential nomination, from what I can tell, then s
by mothballed 1y ago
It had been at least 2 years. [] Never became much of a contentious issue until Kamala was looking at the presidential nomination, from what I can tell, then suddenly there was a vicious fight to remove it based on reasoning that mysteriously didn't exist for years and years before that.
[] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&diff=1217573879&oldid=1080632914 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&...
Edit: at least ~4 years
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&diff=1217573879&oldid=994769654 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&...
- IAmBroom 1y agoOr, it wasn't important enough to merit editorial discussion prior to that.
- mothballed 1y agoFlipping >Any controversial topic should never be read on Wikipedia, it will not be accurate. to >A controversial topic will become important enough to merit editorial discussion Is an interesting point. I think I will vouch you just for the genius of flipping it.