3 ms·
Did you look into why? They always list the reasons. How long had it been on the page?
by altcognito 1y ago
Did you look into why? They always list the reasons. How long had it been on the page?
- mothballed 1y agoIt had been at least 2 years. [] Never became much of a contentious issue until Kamala was looking at the presidential nomination, from what I can tell, then suddenly there was a vicious fight to remove it based on reasoning that mysteriously didn't exist for years and years before that. [] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&diff=1217573879&oldid=1080632914 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&... Edit: at least ~4 years https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&diff=1217573879&oldid=994769654 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&...
- IAmBroom 1y agoOr, it wasn't important enough to merit editorial discussion prior to that.
- mothballed 1y agoFlipping >Any controversial topic should never be read on Wikipedia, it will not be accurate. to >A controversial topic will become important enough to merit editorial discussion Is an interesting point. I think I will vouch you just for the genius of flipping it.