The big detection of 'bullshit' was at the end of the article, in 2 places. 1. " As to all the rest, I cannot but conclude that they are nothing but legal euth

The big detection of 'bullshit' was at the end of the article, in 2 places. 1. " As to all the rest, I cannot but conclude that they are nothing but legal euthanasia, and should be opposed by anyone who identifies themselves as pro-life." Pro-life? As in Christian anti-abortion buzzword? That's awfully strange to see in a "fact based policy paper". 2. Dr. Paul Byrne, a Christian doctor trying to raise public awareness of this issue. (links to renewamerica.com ) So now we get to the root of the matter. Non-religious (cough CHRISTIAN) superPAC sponsoring messages. It even mentions of a strong Christian bent towards policy discussion. I dismiss this whole article with extreme prejudice.