2 ms·
"In my mind, I can’t find a great reason for Apple to sell a nano. Everything it does one of Apple’s other devices does far better, especially for $149." i'm c
by andrewcooke 14y ago
"In my mind, I can’t find a great reason for Apple to sell a nano. Everything it does one of Apple’s other devices does far better, especially for $149."
i'm confused. what other apple device costs $150 or less and does the same? the shuffle doesn't have a screen. everything else is more expensive. what am i missing?
(nice to see the classic still there. will it get the updated connector?)
- tenpoundhammer 14y agoSorry that was bad sentence construction. I meant that for $149 it doesn't have that much functionality compared to say an iPod touch which can sell for as low as $199.
- bunderbunder 14y agoJust like how you think the Touch is obviously superior to the Nano because of certain feature differences, I suspect there are others for whom the Nano is obviously superior to the Touch because of certain feature differences.